Direct Answer Sometimes—but a document called a “motion for rehearing” does not automatically toll the deadline to appeal in a federal civil case. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), the appeal period starts anew after the district court disposes of the last timely motion in a specific group of post-judgment motions; an untimely, unauthorized, or mislabeled request for reconsideration may leave the original appeal deadline running. In most federal civil cases,

Usually, no. A federal order dismissing only some claims or some parties generally is not immediately appealable while other claims remain pending in the same case. Immediate review may nevertheless be available if the district court enters a proper partial final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), certifies a controlling legal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), or the order falls within another narrow exception to the federal final-judgment rule. Without o

Federal courts of appeals generally review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same Rule 56 standard that governed in the district court. The appellate panel views genuinely disputed evidence and reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, but it does not conduct a new trial, hear new witnesses, or accept new evidence. The appeal usually turns on whether the existing record reveals a genuine dispute of material fact, whether the distr

Interlocutory review under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is a discretionary procedure that may permit a federal court of appeals to review an important legal ruling before the district court enters final judgment. It is available only when the district judge certifies that the ruling involves a controlling question of law, substantial grounds exist for disagreement, and an immediate appeal may materially advance the end of the litigation. Certification by the district judge is only the

Direct Answer A business in a federal appeal may be able to ask the federal court of appeals to certify an unsettled, controlling question of state law to the state’s highest court, but the availability of certification depends on the state. For Florida-law questions, federal appellate courts can certify qualifying questions to the Florida Supreme Court. For North Carolina-law questions, the strategy is different because North Carolina does not currently provide the same gene