Se Habla Español
Parliamo Italiano
Los Falamos Portugues
אנחנו מדברים עברית
本店提供中文服务

Constitutional Litigation Attorney

Constitutional Law | Civil Rights & Due Process | Litigation Built for Supreme Court Review

 

At Biazzo Law, PLLC, we represent individuals and businesses in constitutional litigation and complex civil cases involving constitutional issues. Constitutional disputes require more than routine litigation tactics—they demand precision, discipline, and an understanding of how constitutional questions are evaluated by appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court.

​

Led by Attorney Corey Biazzo, a civil trial and appellate lawyer with experience in Supreme Court–level matters, our constitutional litigation practice is built on one guiding principle:

 

Constitutional cases must be litigated with appellate and Supreme Court review in mind from the outset.

​

Constitutional Litigation Is Different From Ordinary Civil Litigation

 

Constitutional cases are not simply disputes between private parties. They often involve:

·       Government action or overreach

·       Due process and procedural fairness

·       Separation of powers

·       Statutory interpretation with constitutional implications

·       Rights protected under state and federal constitutions

 

Because constitutional issues shape how laws are applied beyond a single case, courts evaluate these matters with heightened scrutiny.

​

Effective constitutional litigation requires a legal strategy designed to withstand appellate review at the highest levels.

​

Constitutional Litigation with Appellate Awareness

 

Many constitutional cases fail not because the issue lacks merit, but because the case is not properly framed, preserved, or presented.

​

Our constitutional litigation practice emphasizes:

·       Precise issue framing grounded in constitutional doctrine

·       Careful development of the evidentiary record

·       Strategic motion practice to preserve constitutional claims

·       Awareness of applicable standards of review

·       Anticipation of appellate and Supreme Court scrutiny

 

This appellate-forward approach ensures that constitutional arguments are not lost through procedural missteps or inadequate record development.

​

Types of Constitutional Litigation We Handle

 

Biazzo Law handles constitutional and civil rights litigation involving:

·       Due process violations

·       Equal protection claims

·       Challenges to unconstitutional statutes or regulations

·       Government overreach in civil enforcement actions

·       Separation of powers disputes

·       Constitutional issues arising in civil litigation

·       State and federal constitutional challenges

 

These cases often involve complex legal questions with implications extending well beyond the immediate parties.

​

Trial Discipline in Constitutional Cases

 

Constitutional litigation demands exceptional trial discipline.

Our approach emphasizes:

·       Strategic selection of constitutional claims

·       Clear and concise issue presentation

·       Focused discovery aligned with constitutional arguments

·       Preservation of error for appellate review

·       Avoidance of arguments that undermine credibility on appeal

​

This disciplined approach is essential when litigating constitutional issues in state and federal courts.

​

Constitutional Litigation and the United States Supreme Court

 

Certain constitutional cases present issues of national legal importance and may ultimately require review by the United States Supreme Court.

​

Biazzo Law’s involvement in Supreme Court–level matters informs how constitutional cases are litigated at every stage, including:

·       Framing issues with national and doctrinal significance

·       Anticipating certiorari considerations

·       Understanding the role of amicus curiae briefing

·       Presenting arguments designed for broad judicial audiences

 

Even when a case remains in trial or intermediate appellate courts, it is litigated with the understanding that constitutional arguments must withstand the highest level of judicial review.

​

Constitutional Litigation in Florida and North Carolina

 

Biazzo Law represents clients in Florida and North Carolina constitutional litigation, including matters in:

·       Florida: Broward County, Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County

·       North Carolina: Mecklenburg County, Wake County, Union County, Cabarrus County, Charlotte, Raleigh

 

We also handle federal constitutional litigation and multi-jurisdictional matters, supported by a national appellate practice orientation.

​

This dual focus allows clients to benefit from:

·       Local courtroom familiarity

·       Jurisdiction-specific constitutional insight

·       National-level appellate and Supreme Court strategy

​

Constitutional Litigation for Serious Legal Questions

 

Biazzo Law is not a volume constitutional litigation practice. We focus on constitutional cases where the outcome has lasting legal significance, whether for individuals, businesses, or broader legal principles.

​

Clients who engage our firm typically face:

·       Government actions affecting fundamental rights

·       Civil disputes raising constitutional questions

·       Legal issues likely to attract appellate or Supreme Court review

​

Constitutional Litigation Backed by Appellate Judgment

 

Constitutional cases often define how laws are applied in future disputes. Having counsel who understands how appellate courts and the Supreme Court evaluate constitutional claims provides a critical strategic advantage.

​

If you are facing a constitutional dispute or civil litigation involving constitutional issues, early strategic evaluation can determine whether a result endures—or is lost on review.